Download Ebook [(Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] published on (November, 2009), by Gordon S. Woo
The book [(Empire Of Liberty: A History Of The Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] Published On (November, 2009), By Gordon S. Woo will certainly constantly provide you favorable worth if you do it well. Completing the book [(Empire Of Liberty: A History Of The Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] Published On (November, 2009), By Gordon S. Woo to read will certainly not come to be the only goal. The goal is by getting the good value from the book until completion of the book. This is why; you need to find out even more while reading this [(Empire Of Liberty: A History Of The Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] Published On (November, 2009), By Gordon S. Woo This is not only just how quickly you review a publication and not just has the number of you finished the books; it is about exactly what you have actually acquired from the books.
[(Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] published on (November, 2009), by Gordon S. Woo
Download Ebook [(Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] published on (November, 2009), by Gordon S. Woo
[(Empire Of Liberty: A History Of The Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] Published On (November, 2009), By Gordon S. Woo. In what situation do you like reviewing so considerably? Just what about the type of guide [(Empire Of Liberty: A History Of The Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] Published On (November, 2009), By Gordon S. Woo The should check out? Well, everybody has their own reason ought to read some books [(Empire Of Liberty: A History Of The Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] Published On (November, 2009), By Gordon S. Woo Mainly, it will associate with their necessity to obtain knowledge from the e-book [(Empire Of Liberty: A History Of The Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] Published On (November, 2009), By Gordon S. Woo as well as intend to read merely to obtain enjoyment. Novels, story publication, and various other enjoyable publications end up being so prominent now. Besides, the clinical books will also be the very best factor to decide on, particularly for the students, teachers, doctors, entrepreneur, and various other professions which are fond of reading.
By reading [(Empire Of Liberty: A History Of The Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] Published On (November, 2009), By Gordon S. Woo, you can understand the expertise and also points more, not only concerning just what you get from individuals to individuals. Book [(Empire Of Liberty: A History Of The Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] Published On (November, 2009), By Gordon S. Woo will be a lot more relied on. As this [(Empire Of Liberty: A History Of The Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] Published On (November, 2009), By Gordon S. Woo, it will truly give you the great idea to be effective. It is not just for you to be success in certain life; you can be effective in everything. The success can be begun by understanding the basic expertise as well as do activities.
From the combo of expertise and also actions, a person could boost their ability and also capability. It will certainly lead them to live and function much better. This is why, the students, employees, and even companies ought to have reading practice for publications. Any type of book [(Empire Of Liberty: A History Of The Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] Published On (November, 2009), By Gordon S. Woo will give specific expertise to take all advantages. This is exactly what this [(Empire Of Liberty: A History Of The Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] Published On (November, 2009), By Gordon S. Woo tells you. It will certainly add even more understanding of you to life as well as function far better. [(Empire Of Liberty: A History Of The Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] Published On (November, 2009), By Gordon S. Woo, Try it and prove it.
Based on some experiences of many individuals, it is in truth that reading this [(Empire Of Liberty: A History Of The Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] Published On (November, 2009), By Gordon S. Woo could help them making much better option and also give even more encounter. If you want to be one of them, allow's acquisition this book [(Empire Of Liberty: A History Of The Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] Published On (November, 2009), By Gordon S. Woo by downloading the book on link download in this site. You could get the soft documents of this publication [(Empire Of Liberty: A History Of The Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] Published On (November, 2009), By Gordon S. Woo to download and install and also put aside in your available electronic tools. What are you awaiting? Allow get this publication [(Empire Of Liberty: A History Of The Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] Published On (November, 2009), By Gordon S. Woo online as well as read them in whenever and any kind of place you will certainly check out. It will certainly not encumber you to bring heavy book [(Empire Of Liberty: A History Of The Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] Published On (November, 2009), By Gordon S. Woo within your bag.
- Published on: 2009
- Number of items: 2
- Binding: Hardcover
- 778 pages
Most helpful customer reviews
369 of 401 people found the following review helpful.
Superbly written, fun to read, very sympathetic to Jeffersonian-Republicans
By Paul L
Thesis and Summary:
In this, the 8th volume of Oxford's History of the United States, Gordon Wood weighs in on the Washington through Madison administrations, and gives a broad perspective analysis of the burgeoning American and American culture. Indeed, Wood's thesis can be summed up to say that by 1815 America was a thoroughly transformed nation from the one that initiated the revolution in 1776: a nation that had gone from gentleman leaders to a far more inclusive- albeit brutish- democracy.
Woods begins his journey to American Democracy by explaining the "middling" class of Americans that emerged with the ratification of the Constitution. This new class of Americans did not personify the classical notion of virtue that Federalists found necessary to lead. They were a people possessed of a native congeniality for the sake of prosperity. They were fond of money making (and good at it), they weren't Harvard or Princeton educated, and they voted. It is this middling class that is the protagonist (for lack of better word) of Wood's work. He sees their growth as the Federalists' death and he sees Jefferson as their chief advocate and the man responsible for their ascendance to power. Herein one finds Wood's bias. He simply adores Thomas Jefferson and makes bare faced obeisance to him at every turn of the page it seems while looking to traduce Federalists as much as possible. As I read this substantial work, I couldn't help but to constantly contrast it with Elkins and McKitrick's The Age of Federalism: The Early American Republic, 1788-1800. Both works are monumental in scope, but one is sympathetic to Federalists and the other to Republicans.
Chapters 3, 4 and 5 together offer a perplexing and contradictory view of the Washington administration. One the one hand, Alexander Hamilton and the Federalists ignored the middle class as beneath them. On the other, it was Alexander Hamilton's policies that brought tremendous prosperity that led to Federalist popularity in the wake of the Jay and Pickney treaties and the Whiskey Rebellion. Indeed, throughout the work, Wood never discredits the policies of the Federalists; he just merely gives them no credit for those policies.
In chapter 3, The Federalist Program, Wood makes the somewhat dubious claim that Hamilton did not have the foresight to see the future of American manufacturing. I would think that both of Hamilton's foremost biographers (McDonald and Chernow) would strongly disagree, as would Hamilton himself. Further, Wood makes an attempt to characterize Federalist policies as a Walpoleon spoils system without admitting that this was the first federal government instituted in the United States and suffered the exigencies of such: authority, legitimacy and revenue. Should they have appointed people who wanted nothing more than to undermine federal power in favor of state power? Also, for all of Wood's conjecture of a spoils system, no evidence is presented of a corrupt appointment process.
Chapter 4 shows us the emergence of Jefferson and Madison as the opposition to Federalist policy. They fight the assumption of state debts, the chartering of the Bank of the United States (which they let expire in 1810), and Hamilton's stance on foreign policy. As has become a common theme by this point in the book, Wood manages to find a way to justify Jefferson and Madison's actions with Philip Freneau while he has the time to take umbrage with the tone used by Alexander Hamilton (page 154) in totally destroying Jefferson's erroneous fears of his financial system. It really came as no surprise that Wood came down softly on the Republicans in respect to the Genet mission as well.
Wood does a much better job with the Adams administration than his predecessor. Adams fits the Federalist mold that Woods has pigeonholed them all into. He was a monarchist, a self appointed aristocrat and someone who couldn't have foreseen a use for Wood's "middling" class. Wood's makes an excellent case in chapter 6 that the disinterested aristocrat was not possible in America. American land speculation was terribly risky and none sans John Jay could hope to uphold the image of the landed English gentry. He also hits the nail on the head with the "X,Y, Z Affair" and the "Quasi War." He rightly concludes that Federalist gains were offset by their paranoid fears of the "Jacobian" influence. He does not, however, identify the split in the Federalist camp soon enough. Some time before Adams' failed second run at the Presidency the Federalists had already split between he and Hamilton. Hamilton was, in fact, vehemently against the Alien and Sedition Acts and had already brought many Federalists away from Adams.
Having done away with the Federalists, Wood now turns to Jefferson. Certainly no one writing since Dumas Malone has had a better grasp of Jefferson, but Wood's admiration of the man simply leads to what only can be viewed as equivocating on many points. It seems Woods gives Jefferson credit for the entire Revolution on page 287! Wood does correctly point out Republican ideology on page 311 when he quotes Wartman. When Wartman claims that public opinion leads to egalitarian truth, he basically is laying the groundwork for justifying anything. Of course, this is the same ideology that would be used to justify slavery some decades later. It is this that killed the Federalists. They never had a blind devotion to public opinion because they never viewed themselves as a political party. Republicans began as the opposition party to the first administration, they had always acted as a party whether they admitted it or not. When Jefferson had won power, Federalists were already dissipated enough as to never constitute an opposition party. It was not the "middling" class as Wood assumes that killed the Federalists, but the fact that Federalists never saw themselves as a political party.
Woods two chapters on the law (11 and 12) represent the two strongest chapters in the book. Beginning with his proper distinction of colonial judges against their English counterparts, Wood explains the extraordinary power that has always existed in the U.S. judiciary except under the Articles of Confederation. With the adoption of the Constitution and the Federalist administration, Federalist judges began to bring unified law to all people in the U.S. Wood rightly credit John Marshall as bringing judicial review to the U.S. by using an ex post facto explanation in the Marbury v. Madison case. Woods shows how Marshall treated the constitution as law. Fundamental law to be sure, but law nonetheless, and subject to judges' review as all laws are. Wood also correctly points out the significance of the Dartmouth College case. It single handedly did more to protect the "middling" class and the money making endeavors than any legislation passed by a Republican. Once again, it seems, that Federalist policy and decision making is in fact what allows this "middling" class to emerge, and not the high minded idealism of Thomas Jefferson. In fact, I am hard pressed to find one piece of legislation cited by Wood and enacted by Jeffersonian-Republicans that helped this "middling" class emerge that Wood is so sure was dependent upon them.
With the chapters in Republican Diplomacy and the War of 1812 not even a scholar of Wood's stature can prevaricate enough to hide the disaster of the Republican administrations.
1) Allowing the Bank of the United States to expire was a total failure and had to be re chartered
2) Decreasing the size of the Army and Navy in 1810 was not justifiable
3) Non importation and embargo act were abject failures
4) War of 1812 resulted in the burning of the U.S. Capital and status quo ante
In every case Wood attempts to use the idealism of Madison and Jefferson as a buttress against their poor decisions, even going so far as to compare their trade sanctions with modern day ones (page 633), but it runs rather shallow. Expecting the reader to level out the trade sanctions from a nascent economy to those exercised by the megalith that is the modern U.S. economy is a bit much.
In the end, the conclusion Wood reaches- that Thomas Jefferson was almost singly responsible for the emergence of the new American- simply does not follow from the 738 pages of fact he presented. The heroes that come through are George Washington, Alexander Hamilton and John Marshall.
Style:
Wood's writing is superb and his scholarship is sound. Although I disagree with his conclusions, there is no mistaking the quality of his work. The simple readability of this work is amazing for a tome of this length and depth. To be sure, it is not a simple breeze through over the weekend, but it is not so arduous that you dread having to pick it up each night. Indeed, it is a joy to pick up night after night and read. I took almost 12 pages of notes as I read this book and welcome any comments. I put time and effort into this review, and do recommend this book even though I give it only 3 stars. I hope you find this review helpful even if you do not agree.
146 of 162 people found the following review helpful.
A Love Letter to Thomas Jefferson
By Jonathan Zasloff
What an odd, brilliant, and maddening book. Wood is a very distinguished historian: his The Creation of the American Republic, 1776-1787 (Published for the Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture, Williamsburg, Virginia) is required reading for any student of the revolution, and after several years' hiatus, he has come back with several outstanding works, most notably The Radicalism of the American Revolution and The Americanization of Benjamin Franklin. But like many great scholars, he has become infatuated with his own thesis, namely, that the revolution represented the beginning of a radical cultural transformation of America based on liberty and equality.. And because of this, in Empire of Liberty he makes several judgments of both coverage and assessment that are blinkered and often grotesquely unfair. The bottom line, as other reviewers have suggested, is that in order to adequately appreciate the politics of the early national period, you really should read Wood's work together with Elkins and Mckitrick's The Age of Federalism: The Early American Republic, 1788-1800 or Joseph Ellis' Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation and/or American Sphinx: The Character of Thomas Jefferson. That's a tall order, but Wood unfortunately makes us do it.
First, the good news. Empire of Liberty brilliantly succeeds in avoiding the "high politics" focus of traditional narrative history while also steering clear of dreary, overly technical and quantitative social history. Wood is at his best in this book as a CULTURAL historian, shrewdly demonstrating how the quarter-century between 1789 and 1815 manifested a transformation of American culture. His central organizing concept is that of the growing dominance of "middling sorts," who were neither aristocrats nor mere laborers but rather energetic men on the make (virtually always men), who used their wits and hard work to succeed, and who rejected the traditional deference to political and social elites. Again and again, Wood takes us into small farms and tinkerers' shops, across the Alleghenies and into new land subdivisions, and shows how the first generation of Americans embraced social mobility and a fluid upwardly mobile society. He is particularly brilliant in his discussion of religion, showing how new Protestant sects emerged and rejected the hierarchical nature of traditional Anglican and Congregationalist establishments.
It doesn't hurt that Wood is a superb writer. It is no small feat to actually explain Alexander Hamilton's financial program coherently and clearly, but Wood does it. He is able to keep the reader on the big picture of politics without drowning us in minutiae. And I believe he is particularly persuasive in breaking us out of the old "northern Federalists versus southern Jeffersonians" narrative of the period. Instead, his heroes are the NORTHERN Republicans, who embraced a commercial society and the acquisition of wealth while rejecting what they saw as Federalist condescension.
But he is so focused on these northerners and their Republicanism, so committed to his account of the rise of the middling sorts, so devoted to seeing the time as these people saw it, that he begins to lack all perspective. Jefferson is the hero of this book, and Wood spares no effort in somehow connecting Jefferson to all that was good and true in America during the period. He tries to see Jefferson as Jefferson saw himself. But that's a problem, for few figures in US history have been capable of such thoroughgoing self-deception as The Sage of Monticello. What we wind up with when it comes to assessing republicanism begins to look less like history and more like a propaganda exercise.
The searing, brutal contradiction at the heart of the Jeffersonians' world-view was, of course, their embrace of the slave system. "Why is it that we hear the loudest yelps for freedom from the drivers of Negroes?" asked Dr. Johnson, and while Wood snidely says that Jefferson understood the contradiction and needed no lecturing, he never really grapples with the way in which slavery affected, conditioned, influenced, and controlled every aspect of the Jeffersonian vision. We really hear nothing about slavery until more than 2/3 of the way through the book; Wood provides us with a superb chapter on slavery, and then basically forgets it again until a couple of paragraphs at the conclusion.
He consistently ignores, downplays, elides, or just overlooks what slavery meant politically to the Jeffersonian movement. He never considers the possibility that a key to Jefferson's hatred of national governmental power was the threat of controlling or removing the slave system. Throughout the book we read confident assertions about the meaning of America and Jeffersonian Republicanism, and then with the tag line "at least in the north." But what Wood conveniently fails to face squarely is that the Jeffersonian operation was based on SOUTHERN power: for all his talk about northern Jeffersonians, Jefferson himself and the others at the center of the Republican Party made very sure that the Virginians remained firmly in control. That was why they made sure to destroy Aaron Burr, the only northern Republican who could possibly have threatened them.
If that isn't bad enough, his treatment of the Federalists is just shockingly unfair. The majority of quotes concerning the Federalists, what they believed, and how they behaved comes from their Republican opponents. Virtually every time the word "Federalist" is mentioned, the adjective "aristocratic" precedes it. To hear Wood tell it, you'd never know that at the end of the day, much of the Federalist policy program survived because Jeffersonian attempts to dismantle it were met with catastrophic policy failure. Wood says that the War of 1812 was a triumph of Republicanism without ever getting around to the fact that, say, President Madison reconstituted the Bank of the United States in 1816 because getting rid of it in 1811 drove the country into bankruptcy. Or that the idea of a coherent American NATIONAL identity that eventually emerged was a central FEDERALIST policy goal. Or that the Federalists' insistence on a balanced economy with a substantial manufacturing base eventually came about; instead, you only hear that the manufacturing that emerged was bottom-up, not top-down, as the Federalists wanted. Except that they were far more diverse in thinking than that. No matter: the Federalists were aristocrats, and thus ANY development that was not aristocratic must have been Republican. He insists that northern middling sorts were were Republican because they hated taxes; but it was the success of Hamilton's financial program that enabled the states to reduce taxes. Wood talks about how building roads helped the middling sorts: but it was the Federalists, not the Jeffersonians, who supported it.
Wood mentions Federalist antislavery, but only in passing; why? Because paying more attention to it would have forced him to admit that many Federalists worked hard against slavery, defended Toussaint L'Ouverture's regime in Haiti, and that Jefferson undercut him. You would never know from Wood's account that Jefferson only triumphed in 1800 because of the south's inflated electoral vote total from the 3/5 clause (otherwise, Adams would have remained in office). But Wood can't tell you that, because that would undermine his assertion that there was huge popular love for Jefferson -- a fact that we know because, well, Jefferson said so!
I've gone on too long. This is an important and very good book. It is required reading. But beware. Wood has an agenda, and it's best that it not remain hidden.
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful.
I loved it so much that I read chapters that weren't ...
By Amazon Customer
I could not put this book down. Very well written. I needed this book for a history class. I loved it so much that I read chapters that weren't assigned to read.
See all 157 customer reviews...
[(Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] published on (November, 2009), by Gordon S. Woo PDF
[(Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] published on (November, 2009), by Gordon S. Woo EPub
[(Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] published on (November, 2009), by Gordon S. Woo Doc
[(Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] published on (November, 2009), by Gordon S. Woo iBooks
[(Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] published on (November, 2009), by Gordon S. Woo rtf
[(Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] published on (November, 2009), by Gordon S. Woo Mobipocket
[(Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] published on (November, 2009), by Gordon S. Woo Kindle
[K724.Ebook] Download Ebook [(Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] published on (November, 2009), by Gordon S. Woo Doc
[K724.Ebook] Download Ebook [(Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] published on (November, 2009), by Gordon S. Woo Doc
[K724.Ebook] Download Ebook [(Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] published on (November, 2009), by Gordon S. Woo Doc
[K724.Ebook] Download Ebook [(Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815)] [Author: Gordon S. Wood] published on (November, 2009), by Gordon S. Woo Doc